twister: Fix description of relationship between filter and allow/exclude
The current description of the relationship between the tests filter and the arch/platform allow/exclude was actually incorrect. Let's fix it. Signed-off-by: Alberto Escolar Piedras <alberto.escolar.piedras@nordicsemi.no>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9748b5377
commit
ec273d1357
|
@ -142,15 +142,6 @@ pairs:
|
|||
not (right associative)
|
||||
all comparison operators (non-associative)
|
||||
|
||||
arch_allow, arch_exclude, platform_allow, platform_exclude
|
||||
are all syntactic sugar for these expressions. For instance
|
||||
|
||||
arch_exclude = x86 arc
|
||||
|
||||
Is the same as:
|
||||
|
||||
filter = not ARCH in ["x86", "arc"]
|
||||
|
||||
The ':' operator compiles the string argument as a regular expression,
|
||||
and then returns a true value only if the symbol's value in the environment
|
||||
matches. For example, if CONFIG_SOC="stm32f107xc" then
|
||||
|
@ -159,6 +150,22 @@ pairs:
|
|||
|
||||
Would match it.
|
||||
|
||||
Note that arch_allow, arch_exclude, platform_allow, platform_exclude
|
||||
are not just syntactic sugar for filter expressions. For instance
|
||||
|
||||
arch_exclude = x86 arc
|
||||
|
||||
Can appear at first glance to have a similar effect to
|
||||
|
||||
filter = not ARCH in ["x86", "arc"]
|
||||
|
||||
but unlike "filter", these cause platforms to be filtered already during the testplan
|
||||
generation. While "filter" does not exclue platforms at the testplan generation, and instead
|
||||
relies on the result of running the build configuration stage. That is, to evaluate the filter
|
||||
expression, cmake is run for that target, and then the filter evaluated as a gate for the
|
||||
build and run steps.
|
||||
Therefore filtering by using {platform|arch}_{exclude|allow} is much faster.
|
||||
|
||||
The set of test cases that actually run depends on directives in the testsuite
|
||||
files and options passed in on the command line. If there is any confusion,
|
||||
running with -v or examining the test plan report (testplan.json)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue