This is throwing errors in static analysis, complaining that comparing
that a prior is higher and lower is impossible. That is wrong per my
eyes (I swear I think it might be cueing off the names of the
functions, which invert "higher" and "lower" to match our reversed
priority numbers).
But frankly this was never a very readable macro to begin with.
Refactor to put the bounds into the term, so the static analyzer can
prove it locally, and add a build assertion to catch any errors (there
are none currently) where the low<->high priority range is invalid.
Long term, we should probably remove this macro, it doesn't provide
much value. But removing it in response to a static analysis failure
is... not very responsible as a development practice.
Fixes#14816Fixes#14820
Signed-off-by: Andy Ross <andrew.j.ross@intel.com>
e59d19628d